Friday, January 8, 2016
Murder of Karyn Hearn Slover
The murder of Karyn Hearn Slover occurred on September 27, 1996 in Decatur, Illinois, when Karyn disappeared shortly after leaving her job as an advertising sales representative at the Decatur Herald & Review. Karyn was a 23-year-old mother whose dismembered body was discovered wrapped in plastic bags sealed with duct tape in Lake Shelbyville. Karyn's ex-mother- and father-in-law Jeannette Slover and Michael Slover, Sr and ex-husband, Michael Slover, Jr were charged and convicted in 2002 for the crime of first degree murder. The case is notable for being one of the first instances of animal DNA testing as evidence in a murder trial.
Disappearance and search: On September 27, 1996 Karyn left work at 5 p.m. with the intent to pick up her son Kolten and then shop for a dress at the Hickory Point Mall in Forsyth, Illinois. Later that night a black Pontiac Bonneville was discovered in central Illinois on westbound I-72 with its engine still running, its headlights on, and the driver's side door open. The car was reported to be registered to David Swann, Karyn's boyfriend, but contained some of Karyn's personal effects including her purse and driver's license. Swann reported her as a missing persons and a search campaign was conducted. At this time it was theorized that Karyn could have been the victim of a car-jacking, as investigators did not view her as likely to have voluntarily left the area due to her recently signing with a modeling agency for a job. On October 1, 1996 the remains of an unidentified female body were discovered in Lake Shelbyville, wrapped in plastic bags that were weighed down with concrete blocks. The remains were confirmed to be those of Karyn through her dental records and physical evidence such as a blood droplet and fingerprint were recovered from a bridge that overlooked the lake.
Murder investigation: A task force was formed to proceed with what was now a murder case and several leads were investigated, such as an ex-boyfriend of Karyn's as well as her ex-husband Michael. An autopsy of Karyn's body showed that Karyn had been shot six times, once in the back of the head and an additional five times in the forehead, before being dismembered and the body parts placed in the plastic bags. Police found several strands of dog hair on the duct tape and remnants of cinders and tall grass. Swann was suspected of the crime as his alibi initially did not cover him for a forty-minute period. Investigators were also suspicious of several actions that Swann had performed during the initial search for Karyn and because he owned a handgun matching the type that had shot Karyn. Swann participated with police during a search warrant and was eventually cleared of suspicion after footage from an ATM surveillance video cleared him for the missing 40 minutes of his alibi. Alibis for other suspects such as Michael Jr and Karyn's ex-boyfriend also ruled them out as suspects. A break in the case came in 1998, when police noticed that broken concrete at Miracle Motors, a business owned by Karyn's ex-father-in-law Michael Slover Sr, were similar to concrete blocks used to weigh down Karyn's body. A forensic geologist was brought in to see if anything on the Slovers' business matched evidence found at the scene of the crime. The geologist found that not only was the concrete consistent with that found at Miracle Motors, but that evidence found in the abandoned car was also likely from Slover's business. The task force sifted through dirt at Miracle Motors and eventually discovered a metal rivet and a plastic button that fit a pair of Paris Club jeans and a white shirt that Karyn had been wearing the day of her murder. Police also reported finding bones at the scene, but these were not introduced to trial and were believed to have been animal meat bones that came from food fed to two dogs that Slover used to secure the property. Police then began to suspect that Michael Slover Sr and his wife Jeannette had performed the murder over custody issues, as Karyn had expressed interest in moving away to pursue her modelling career and take her son Kolten with her. Before arresting the Slovers the investigators had a veterinary geneticist perform a DNA analysis on the animal hairs found on the duct tape, which was matched to hairs retrieved from an animal brush that had been used on the dogs Slover kept on his business property. The police used this evidence to arrest the Slovers, which would be later thrown out during an appeals process by the Slovers. The Slovers, which included their son Michael Slover Jr, were all arrested with the charge of first degree murder, although Michael Sr and Michael Jr were both given the additional charge of attempting to conceal a crime. Michael, Jr. had been at work, which was confirmed, but he repeatedly called his parents that day, which made him a suspect in concealing the crime.
Trial: On May 18, 2002, the Slovers were all found guilty of first degree murder and were later sentenced to 60 years in prison, with both Michael Jr and his father receiving an extra five years for the charge of concealing a crime.
Custody battle: The following year in August 2003, There were concerns were raised over the custody of Karyn's son Kolten, who had been adopted by Mary Slover, Karyn's ex-sister-in-law. Authorities argued that Mary had been aware of the murder and could have potentially helped in concealing the crime. A judge later ruled that Mary was unfit as an adoptive parent and that she should not retain custody. Mary contested the ruling, which she claimed influenced a case worker to change her report, which initially contained a recommendation that Kolten be returned to Mary. Despite this, Mary officially lost custody of Kolten in October 2003.
Appeal: The Slovers appealed their murder sentences, stating that media coverage preceding the trial had tainted the potential jury pool and prevented them from receiving a fair trial. Concerns were also raised about other elements such as the animal DNA testing, as well as evidence that the murder could have been committed by one of several alternative suspects. A judge ruled against opening a second trial for the Slovers, stating that he found no evidence of misconduct or prejudice.
Innocence Project: The Illinois branch of the Innocence Project expressed interest in the Slovers and conducted an investigation into the case. The group circulated a petition to have the Slovers' case re-examined as well as examining evidence to find potential proof that the Slovers did not commit Karyn's murder. The group requested that the fingerprint found at the Lake Shelbyville bridge be tested as evidence, but the move was rejected in 2010 by Assistant Circuit Court Judge Timothy Steadman, who stated: "Because the latent print is not suitable for the requested testing, there is no potential to produce new evidence materially relevant to the defendants' assertion of actual innocence".
Media: The murder and the subsequent investigation have been the focus of several episodes of investigative true crime shows. The case was examined in a 2006 episode of the truTV television series Forensic Files, the 2005 premiere episode of the Discovery Channel series Guilty or Innocent?, and a 2010 episode of the Investigation Discovery show Cold Blood.
Labels:
criminal justice
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment