Where is Emily?

One New Year’s Eve someone tells a story and the suspects’ story has an airtight alibi. But where is Emily? Does she even exist? Or is she a figment of several people’s imagination? Here is the incredible story of 2 girls a mix up and a question, “what happened that faithful new year’s eve?” It was late. Sometime near midnight. A witness sees someone they say is talking to a girl. The girl has fire red hair. The suspect talking to the girl is about taller than the witness and blonde. They talk. Both know a boy from Northwest. The next morning the boy they both know storms into the suspects’ room shouting, “What’d you say to Candy?” The suspect claims their innocence saying they never talked to Candy. The boy says, “of course you know her. You talked to her. You hung out with her last night.” The girl with the streaked hair proclaims her innocence. The witness says it’s the girl with the streaked hair. The witness tells investigators it’s the girl with the blonde streak. The girl swears up and down it’s not her. She claims she has an air tight alibi: her best friend. They were together all night. The mother of the suspect also is told the girl with the streaked hair is the one who talked to Candy. Can the girl with the blonde streaked hair prove that she was the one who had the alibi? Or can’t she? Will justice prevail or will an innocent girl be framed for something she didn’t do and stuff her didn’t say? What is the truth about that New Year’s night in 2011 and who was with “Candy” that night talking? Where is this “Emily”? Was she there as the suspect now claims? Or was she made up to give the suspect an alibi? Pick a side and we’ll see if you are right. What evidence is there to help the prosecution’s claim of the blonde streaked girl talking to his friend? How reliable is the eye witness’ account of the blonde streaked girl talking to her? What about the defenses claim of the air tight alibi? Was there even an alibi? Does the defense team have any tricks up their sleeves? Are there any witnesses to the streaked girl’s story? Can that story be corroborated at all? Is it all biased on hearsay and eye witnesses? Was there someone else talking to “Candy” that night back in 2011? What really happened when the eye witness is wrong? Is the eye witness wrong and is the suspect right? What really happened back on that fateful night back in December 31st 2011? Is there really a need for such a fuss when the person was wrong? When will it happen again? Will it happen again? Most cases with eye witness are falsely identified. The prosecution claims its one person while another says it’s not them. They claim it. They have false convictions because of it. The prosecution will convict because of bad eye witnesses. The witnesses will convict due to several factors such as: relationship with the suspect/ victim. In this case the witness sees it and informs the suspects’ mother and brother. The brother wants to get information out of the suspect but can’t get anything out of her. The suspect tries her mother. The mother says that she (the suspect) was with “Candy” talking that night. The suspect can’t believe it. Did she really ditch her friend and talk to this “Candy”? She refuses to believe it. She claims unless she was in the restroom or her friend was in the restroom she was with her friend all night. There was that unaccounted for time; that “window of opportunity” that the suspect COULD have talked to her. The defense team said that she (the suspect) was here they left each other to “take care of their business”. They also claimed that her friend had some qualms with meeting and hanging out with new people. They claimed the friend wanted to go upstairs and watch Harry Potter but the suspect made her go down stairs and hang out with others. The friend was reluctant but gave in. The brother thinks this is a ploy to have an “alibi”. The only problem was that the brother, the mother and the alleged suspect knew her alibi. The mother made the suspect stick to her. She stayed true to her word. She stuck to her friend like glue and had her do things out of her friend’s comfort zone. She helped alleviate the girl’s qualms. But what really happened in the unaccounted for times when the girls had to “take care of business”? Did the witness tell the truth or mix up the people? Was the suspect really a suspect or was she not even an element in this? How much taller was this girl with the “blonde hair” than the witness? Where was the suspect’s friend? Was there even a friend? If the witness actually mixed up then who was talking with “Candy”? Did the lighting affect who the person is? It certainly can confuse people. As can time of day, how many people are in an area and how attentive a person is. Here is the account from every angle. Sometime during the night there were 2 girls talking. One had red hair and the other one had dyed blonde hair. I thought it looked like one of my former charges. I thought I saw her talking to one of the boys’ girlfriends. She was taller than I am. I thought she was Jackie. I told her mom that “Jackie was talking with Candy.” Jackie’s mom told Hunter that his sister was talking with one of his friends with the party. Then Hunter opened Jackie’s door demanding to know what she’d said to Candy. Jackie claimed she knew nothing of what happened. “My brother abruptly opened the door and yelled, ‘what’d you say to her last night’?” Jackie tells me. “I say, ‘what? You aren’t making any sense. I was with Emily ALL NIGHT stupid’.” Naturally her brother doesn’t believe her and tells her to tell him what he was talking about with Candy the other night. Jackie swears up and down she never talked to her let alone spent any significant time with the girl. She says she may’ve seen her in passing but nothing else.